Who's Land is it Anyway?

The ownership of territory usually appears to follow the rule that "Possession is nine tenths of the law, but historical ownership could be taken into account. The nation of Israel appears to hold its territory by both criteria. (see below, re Judea and Samaria) However, the ownership of Israel is a special case as it is the only territory which has been specially allocated by God.

See also Biblical Christian Zionism for a balancing view of God's purposes for the Land and a Biblical viewpoint for the Christian Zionist. Avoid running ahead of God and becoming political.

"In Genesis ch15 v9,10,17-21 we read how God made a covenant with Abram to give his descendants the land from "the river of Egypt to the great river, the River Euphrates". This was for his descendents through Isaac, not Ishmael with whom God made a separate covenant (Gen 17 v19-21) and who he gave other lands.

David's kingdom extended from the Wadi of Egypt (present South Western border) up to Euphrates in present day Syria. Israel captured the Sinai peninsula in 1967 but gave it back since it was not theirs by God's covenant. David's kingdom also included a strip of present day Jordan up the East bank of the Jordan (ancient Edom, Moav and Amon).

The Arab nations deny the right of Israel to exist, and have three times attempted to destroy it. They refused to absorb the Arab refugees from the wars they started, while Israel absorbed a similar number of Jewish refugees.

Try this simple exercise with a map and a pair of scissors. Cut out Israel and all the Arab lands and then compare the area. You could also consider where oil wealth is located.

The little gulf states do not show up very well. Iran is not included, not being Arab; just Islamic. You could do the same exercise comparing the Islamic nations with Israel. The Arab nations have 672 times as much land as the Jews have, but they will not accept a Jewish state in their neighbourhood.

Even the yellow bit of Israel is claimed by the Arabs, but that is not the ultimate goal.

The Palestinians have this map of the area, showing that their aim is the total removal of Israel, and the Jews, from the world map.

This is nothing to do with the proposed Palestine state which would be the so called West Bank and Gaza. This is only the latest step. See Comments page for policy statements from Palestinian spokesmen.

When Joshua and the children of Israel entered the promised land they were to destroy the pagan people who lived there; a task in which they were only partly successful. The land was allocated on God's instructions, not to be owned or traded, but to be held in trust. The Law contained provisions to ensure land remained in the families and any land which had been sold reverted in each Jubilee year. When the people turned away from God he removed them from the land but brought later generations back. The land remained God's property for the homeland of his chosen people. The twentieth century saw God's chosen nation returning to this Promised Land from their longest and most painful exile.

When the Jews returned to the Holy Land it was not inhabited by "the Palestinian nation", it was desolate and empty. An eighteenth century French author called it a "ruined and desolate land" . . . . "nothing but houses in ruins". A British archaeologist said Palestine was "lacking people to till its fertile soil". A 19th century poet said, "Outside the gates of Jerusalem, we saw, indeed, no living object, heard no living sound." In 1897 Mark Twain wrote, "Palestine sits in sackcloth and ashes . . . desolate and unlovely . . . it is a dreamland."

( It is said that the seasonal rains ceased in 70CE, as the Exile commenced, and did not recommence until the return started during the British Mandate. )

The Jews bought their land from absentee landlords, in many cases. The Jews did not dispossess an Arab nation of their flourishing homeland - they rejuvenated their Promised Land which had lain waste during their exile. Most of the "Palestinians" moved in later to share the prosperity created by the returning Jews. Palestinians who speak frankly will tell you that it is better to work for Jews than for Arabs.


On November 2nd 1917 Britain promised the land of Palestine to the Jews as a homeland under the "Balfour Declaration. At the end of the 1914-1918 war Britain reneged on this in the "White Paper" calling for an Arab state in the British mandate of Palestine.	On 29th November 1947, the League of Nations / United Nations voted to partition Palestine. Although there were twice as many Jews as Arabs, The Arabs got 77% and the Jews got 23% .

"The West Bank" / "Occupied Palestinian Territories" / Judea and Samaria

On November 29th in 1947, the U.N. General Assembly adopted Resolution 181 (II), which resolved that a Jewish state and another Arab state would be created out of what was left of Palestine (after over half of the Holy Land had already been awarded to the Arab, Hashemite Kingdom of Jordan).

The Jewish inhabitants accepted their tiny state. The Arabs did not accept the UN resolution which accepted the existence of a Jewish state. Thus began the Palestinian obsession to "push the Jews into the sea." And so while Israel remembers November 29 for the UN's recognition of the legitimacy of a Jewish state - however tiny - the Arab world has memorialized it as "Al-Nakba," the Disaster.

Each year the UN hosts a formal event and commiserates with the Palestinians over their misfortune from the UN's passage of resolution 181! At its 27th "International Day of Solidarity with the Palestinian People" meeting in 2005, a map of the Middle East was presented at the event attended by Kofi Annan and the presidents of the UN Security Council and General Assembly, but the state of Israel was nowhere to be seen on the map!

It should be remembered that because the U.N. adopts a resolution, it is not necessarily, right or just or legal; it is just the will of the majority and their self interest.

As soon as the State of Israel came into being on 14th May 1948 the (British trained and equipped) armies seven Arab nations invaded the newly reduced Israel in order to destroy it. Israel faced them with 18,000 men armed with 10,000 rifles. Even so the Lord God of Israel gave the Israelis victory. Israel had, however lost the Mountains of Judea and Samaria.

When next Israel fought for its survival, in the six day war of 1967, it regained the mountains, Jerusalem and won the Sinai peninsula.

The cease fire line of 1948 became the line between Israel and its own "West Bank". In spite of Jordan having occupied the territory by force in 1948, Israel is now said to be occupying the West Bank. It is all a matter of playing with words and dates.

The corridor between the "West Bank" and the sea is only 14km wide at its narrowest point. Thus, if the Palestinians gained the West Bank, they could easily choke Israel's North - South routes up the coastal plains by attacking from the high ground.

International Law concerning the disputed territory.

"Where the holder of territory has seized that territory in the lawful exercise of self defence it has, against the prior holder, better title. As between Israel , acting defensively in 1948 and 1967, on the one hand, and her Arab neighbours, acting aggressively, in 1948 and 1967, on the other, Israel has the better title in the territory of what was Palestine, including the whole of Jerusalem, than do Jordan and Egypt." (Stephen Schwebel, American Journal of International Law, May 1970.

Under the Mandate agreed to by the allied powers at the Treaty of San Remo, in 1920, the "Jewish National Home" was to include Judea, Samaria, the Gaza Strip, Jordan, Israel and the Golan Heights. This was approved by the League of Nations and was thus a matter of international law. This has never been revoked! Although Jordan annexed Judea and Samaria in 1950 after invading Israel in 1948, the annexation was never internationally recognized and even the British did not recognize the annexation of East Jerusalem. Since these territories were never legally Jordanian (Palestinian), Israel can not be said to be an "occupier" since international law holds that an occupying power is one that has taken land from its legitimate sovereign in an act of aggression. The recapture of this territory thus returned to compliance with international law. (Professor Talia Einhorn, a teacher of international law, quoted in "israel today, August 2003)

The UN Resolution 242 of 22nd November 1967, is regularly misquoted as pressing Israel to give up "all territories".

Resolution 242 actually calls for . . . .

Resolution 242 says every state should have defensible boundaries, free from threats. Barak offered that but Arafat responded with the "Intifada".

(We know how Anti-Israel the UN is and how unjust even Resolution 242 is) See also Christians against Israel for an overview of the U.N. attitude towards Israel.

For a thorough explanation of the issue of the Land, read "The Mountains of Israel" by Norma Parrish Archbold.

This book shows with scripture and maps that the "West Bank" is the "Mountains of Israel" of God's covenant and may not be traded for an illusion of peace. It concludes with a salutary look at Balaam's attempts to curse the Children of Israel for the King of Moab (in present day Jordan) during their return from exile. (Read the story in Numbers 22-24.) We are reminded that Israel is returning from its Roman exile and that Western leaders are being pressed to curse Israel and kick him out of the Mountains of Israel. What will God use like Balaam's donkey this time in order to make them understand?

See also Ramon Bennett's, "When Day and Night Cease", especially to see how the land conflict is fulfilling God's purposes for establishing Israel and then His kingdom.

The state of Israel came into being on 14th April 1948 - a day in advance of the UN declared date, since that was a Shabbat. The Haftorah reading for that day was from the end of Amos.

"In that day I will restore David's fallen tent. I will repair its broken places, restore its ruins, and build it as it used to be, so that they may possess the remnant of Edom and all the nations that bear my name," declares the LORD, who will do these things. "The days are coming," declares the LORD, "when the reaper will be overtaken by the plowman and the planter by the one treading grapes. New wine will drip from the mountains and flow from all the hills. I will bring back my exiled people Israel; they will rebuild the ruined cities and live in them. They will plant vineyards and drink their wine; they will make gardens and eat their fruit. I will plant Israel in their own land, never again to be uprooted from the land I have given them," says the LORD your God.

Whatever man may decide and decree, the will of the sovereign Lord of the Universe seems clear enough!

Who is entitled to the Land of Israel is a very complex and emotive subject.

Steve Maltz has produced an excellent study of all the arguments over this land which has been called by so many different names, all of which convey somebody's point of view.

The writing style is clear, witty, refreshing and provocative.

The Land of Many Names by Steve Maltz ISBN 1-86024-287-1

www.thelandofmanynames.com